Which term describes a software product that is a child of an existing product and is not licensable?

The term that accurately describes a software product that is a child of an existing product and is not licensable is "non-licensable." This designation indicates that the product cannot be obtained or used under a licensing agreement, which is typically due to it being an extension or modification of a parent software without its own separate licensing terms.

In the context of software products, a non-licensable product might often be something that enhances or modifies the functionality of the original software, such as patches, which are usually released to address bugs or security issues without changing the fundamental licensing structure of the main software. However, because this product is categorized as a child of the existing product, it does not have its own license and relies on the licensing of the parent product.

This understanding helps clarify why other terms are less suitable. For example, "driver" generally refers to software that allows the operating system to communicate with hardware devices, which does not apply here. "Licensable" implies that the product can be legally purchased or used under a license, contradicting the nature of being non-licensable. "Patch," while it may be related to non-licensable products, specifically refers to a correction or update and does not